New
Computer Report Card shows
U.S. companies fail environmental screen
New national Computer TakeBack Campaign announced
Madison,
WI - In a nationally coordinated action, groups across the U.S.
have joined together to release the 3rd Annual Computer Report Card
and to launch the Computer TakeBack Campaign. The Computer Report
Card provides consumers, local governments, and activists with a
tool to measure electronics equipment and the environmental performance
of companies that produce computers. The Computer Report Card reveals
that US companies are continuing to lag further behind their overseas
competitors in clean production, health-related issues and producing
environmentally superior products.
"E-waste
(electronic waste) is one of the fastest growing and most toxic
waste streams -- threatening human health and the environment,"
said Ted Smith, Executive Director of the Silicon Valley Toxics
Coalition and National Coordinator of the Computer TakeBack Campaign.
In response
to this growing environmental threat, dozens of organizations across
the country have formed the Computer TakeBack Campaign to promote
producer responsibility and clean production in the personal computer
and consumer electronics industry. The Campaign provides a forum
for consumers and local governments to voice their concern for an
appropriate, effective solution to the electronics waste issue.
"Many companies
in countries throughout Europe and Asia are implementing extended
producer responsibility programs in response to government regulations,"
said David Wood of the Grassroots Recycling Network and Organizing
Director of the Computer TakeBack Campaign. "Having producers
assume responsibility for their products requires them to internalize
costs they now pass on to taxpayers and local governments. Producer
take back requirements also create a powerful incentive to reduce
such costs by designing products that are cleaner and safer, more
durable and reusable, and easier to disassemble and recycle."
The Campaign's
Report Card reveals several troubling double standards in the global
production of computers: between countries, among companies, and
even within companies doing business in different areas of the world.
Over the past year, several environmental and health initiatives
with important impacts on the high-tech sector have come forth in
Europe and Japan. In stark contrast, there have been no major initiatives
in the U.S.
"Consumers
in the US are receiving second-class treatment from high-tech companies
that think they're first-class global companies," said David
Wood of the GrassRoots Recycling Network.
The Computer
Report Card results indicate that companies maintain disparate practices
by meeting higher standards outside of the U.S. Yet these same companies
do not transfer these practices back home:
- Since 1989,
IBM has offered product take-back programs in certain European
countries free of charge where required by law. By contrast, IBM
announced a U.S. take-back effort earlier this year, but charge
$29.99 per unit-- a clear disincentive for consumer participation.
- Apple Computer
of Germany provides a take-back program where customers can return
electronic appliances at no charge due to legislative requirements,
but offer no such program to US consumers.
- In a similar
case, Sony Electronics and other partners unveiled a limited 5-year
program in October 2000 to collect and recycle electronics from
residential customers in certain parts of the US. On the other
hand, the same company has a full scale take-back program for
computer monitors in Germany.
- Finally,
the European Parliament recently voted to phase out the use of
some of the most hazardous substances in the electronics industry,
as has Japan. As a result, some Japanese companies offer lead
free products or products without brominated flame retardants.
US companies are lagging well behind.
"Companies
in Europe and Asia are detoxifying their products and taking them
back," said Michael Bender of the Mercury Policy Project. "The
Campaign urges U.S. companies to plug into Extended Producer Responsibility."
In particular,
a widening chasm exists among practices of companies in Japan and
those in the US. Seven out of the top ten ranked companies in this
year's Computer Report Card are based in Japan. On the overall
scores, with a few exceptions, most US companies scored near the
bottom of the pack.
Report
Card Leaders and Laggards |
Leaders
Scores |
|
Laggards
Scores |
Canon
|
Japan |
35 |
|
Hitachi
|
Japan |
20 |
Toshiba |
Japan |
33 |
|
Oki |
Japan |
20 |
IBM
|
US |
32 |
|
Seiko
Epson |
Japan |
19 |
Fujitsu
|
Japan |
30 |
|
Compaq
|
US |
17 |
Sony
|
Japan |
30 |
|
Matsushita/Panasonic
|
Japan |
17 |
NEC |
Japan |
27 |
|
Dell |
US |
16 |
Hewlett
-Packard |
US |
26 |
|
Samsung |
Korea |
15 |
Brother
|
Japan |
26 |
|
Sharp |
Japan |
14 |
Apple
|
US |
25 |
|
Micron
|
US |
11 |
|
|
|
|
Gateway
|
US |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Philips
|
Dutch |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Lexmark
|
US |
6 |
|
|
|
|
ViewSonic
|
US |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Acer |
Taiwan |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Wyse
Technologies |
Taiwan |
2 |
|
|
|
|
e-machines |
US |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Daewoo
|
Korea |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Lucky Goldstar |
Korea |
0 |
|
|
|
|
AST
|
Taiwan |
0 |
One of the
key issues is the critical need to implement responsible electronic
recycling and management programs--and to have producers accept
that responsibility. Currently, most "obsolete" electronic
products are not recycled, and the expense of collecting, managing
and disposing of discarded electronics is usually borne by taxpayer-funded
government programs, primarily at the local level. The Computer
TakeBack Campaign's ultimate aims are fostering an ethic of producer
responsibility, clean production, pollution prevention and waste
avoidance through a hierarchy of practices, including source reduction,
reuse, re-manufacturing and recycling.
Report Card
Recommendations
- For Consumers:
Make use of your purchasing power! It is one of the strongest
tools for initiating change in corporate behavior. Buy a new computer
only if you really need to and when you do, buy the most environmentally
sound option - look for the eco-labels at http://www.svtc.org/cleancc/greendesign/index.html
- For Governments:
Learn from your counterparts in Europe and Japan and pass laws
to establish take back programs and Extended Producer Responsibility,
and phase out the most toxic, persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals.
Use your institutional buying power to promote environmentally
preferable purchasing.
- For Computer
Companies:
Follow the lead of your global competitors. Accept full life cycle
responsibility for your products. Include clear and concise disclosures
about the toxics in your products and how consumers can access
take-back programs.
The Computer
Report Card is being released in over one dozen metropolitan areas,
including Boston, MA; NY, NY; Washington, DC; Atlanta, GA; Montpelier,
VT, Philadelphia, PA; Madison, WI; Milwaukee, WI; Minneapolis, MN;
Austin, TX; Boulder, CO; Portland, OR, Austin, TX, Providence, RI;
and San Jose, CA.
Founding members
of the Computer TakeBack Campaign include: As You Sow Foundation,
Clean Production Network, Clean Water Action, Communications Workers
of America, GrassRoots Recycling Network, INFORM, Institute for
Local Self Reliance, Materials for the Future Foundation, Mercury
Policy Project, and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. For more information
on the Computer Report Card, the Campaign Platform and its participants,
visit us on the web at www.svtc.org
or www.grrn.org.
The Report Card
scores are out of a possible maximum score of 68, based on a 0-4
rating applied to each of 17 different criteria relating to the
companies' practices in areas of: hazardous materials practices;
producer take back; occupational safety and health; and, ease of
access to information. Raw data was obtained from company web sites.
Once the data were compiled and analyzed, each company received
information specific to it for review, comment and correction.
The full text
of the report is available on-line at http://www.svtc.org/cleancc/pubs/2001report.htm.
###
|