|
|
back
as
seen in...
Coke yet to address PET collection plan
By
Steve Toloken
PLASTICS NEWS STAFF
WILMINGTON,
DEL. (April 19, 11:05 a.m. EDT) -- Is
there enough recycled PET in the United States to satisfy Coca-Cola Co.´s
needs?
That´s the question some environmentalists are asking now that Coke
officially has taken the wraps off its plans to ramp up recycled content
in the United States.
Some experts say Coke´s action will put a squeeze on already-tight
supplies of recycled PET.
Coke has talked about boosting PET collection to ease the potential crunch.
But its plans are so lacking in substantive detail that they open up the
company to more criticism, according to environmentalists and shareholders
who brought a resolution to Coke´s annual shareholders meeting April
18 in Wilmington.
"It´s pretty disappointing," said Conrad MacKerron, director
of the As You Sow Foundation´s corporate accountability program.
He complained that Coke Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Doug Daft´s
responses to questions about recycling "kept repeating the same thing"
and "basically avoided all the questions."
"If they really are serious, they need to put a plan in place,"
he said. "Without that, it is greenwashing."
Some environmental groups attacked Coke in comments at the meeting, criticizing
the company for fighting bottle bills and for not agreeing to use 25 percent
recycled content in its plastic containers, as the company does in Australia
and several other countries.
Daft featured Coke´s plans to use 10 percent recycled PET in all
its bottles by 2005. He told a large crowd of shareholders that the company
does not have the technology to use more than 10 percent in the United
States, but Coke officials later clarified Daft´s statement to say
while the technology exists, there is not enough capacity right now to
get much higher than 10 percent in the United States.
Ben Jordan, environmental manager for Coca-Cola North America, said in
an interview after the annual meeting that the company may go higher than
10 percent by 2005, but he declined to provide more specifics.
"When we get 10 percent, we´ll start ratcheting up," he
said. "It´s more of a supply issue and a technological capacity
issue."
What exactly would Coke´s action mean for recycled PET markets?
That´s hard to say. Atlanta-based Coke does not disclose how much
PET its bottlers use, but environmentalists estimate from market-share
data that it uses about 800 million pounds of PET a year.
Ten percent of 800 million, then, would be 80 million pounds of recycled
PET. That´s about 10 percent of the 770 million pounds of PET collected
for recycling in 1999.
Predicting the numbers in 2005 is tough because presumably both numbers
will grow. One complication: some observers also expect PET to become
a larger part of Coke´s packaging mix.
"You certainly could draw the inference that if Coke gets significantly
more (recycled) PET, that will put more pressure on the existing users,"
said Luke Schmidt, president of the National Association for PET Container
Resources in Charlotte, N.C.
While the shareholder groups praised Coke for doing much more than PepsiCo
Inc., they would like Coke to endorse deposit legislation or provide a
plan to get recycling to bottle-bill levels of about 80 percent.
Jordan said Coke will continue to fight bottle bills because they put
tremendous burdens on bottlers and retailers. But he added that Coke is
putting a new emphasis on boosting falling recycling rates.
"I think in the past we´ve been so strong on our anti-deposit
(position) that we haven´t let ourselves be aggressive enough on
getting rates up," Jordan said.
Coke will develop eight or 10 model programs this year to work with its
large customers, like universities and cruise lines, and then expand those
in 2002. The company will insert pro-recycling messages into its consumer
marketing, and is interested in the all-bottles program pushed by the
American Plasticss Council, he said.
"There are a million and one things between ... where we are now,
and laying down and accepting bottle bills," Jordan said. "Let´s
do a few of those million and one things, a lot of which we´ve never
tried before."
In a development that may lead to some consensus on boosting supply, Coke
said it will participate with a group of environmentalists on a study
of the economics of different forms of recycling, including deposits and
curbside collection.
Jordan said Coke and the group Businesses and Environmentalists Allied
for Recycling will share the study´s cost. BEAR is affiliated with
Santa Monica, Calif.-based Global Green USA, and its membership includes
the Natural Resources Defense Council.
That´s significant because it may force Coke and BEAR to find common
ground, rather than the typical case where industry and environmentalists
fund separate studies to tout their favorite approaches.
While the study is not likely to recommend one approach, the plan is not
without some risk for Coke, Jordan said.
He added that Coke has considered joining BEAR.
"The thought is, we´ll do the study first and sort of see where
it goes. We had entertained doing both at the same time," Jordan
said.
While Coke did not present recycling-rate goals as some shareholders wanted,
Plastics News previously reported that Coke has considered endorsing a
goal of around 60 percent. But Jordan said that topic was shelved during
recycling discussions Coke had with its eight largest bottlers.
Because recycling rates are calculated across the industry, and not specific
to a company, the bottlers had questions about Coke making that commitment
on its own, he said.
"It doesn´t make sense to have a Coca-Cola goal on recycling
rates, at least for now," Jordan said.
A shareholders´ resolution that asked Coke to support an 80 percent
recycling rate and to use 25 percent recycled content by Jan. 1, 2005,
failed. According to an unofficial tally, the resolution had support from
about 5.2 percent of the voting shares, while 4.7 percent abstained. MacKerron
said getting more than 3 percent ensures the resolution will be on the
ballot next year.
###
|