|   |   |  
   Last 
        modified: 
        
        March 23, 2019
 back
 
 
         
          | PROBLEM: 
            More than 120 billion aluminum, plastic and glass 
            disposable, single-serve beverage containers are littered or wasted 
            in the United States every year, and container recycling rates are 
            plummeting. This unconscionable waste of resources has enormous energy, 
            climate change and pollution impacts. Worse, the beverage industry 
            is working overtime to replace industry operated return-refill systems 
            with wasteful, taxpayer funded collection systems all over the world. 
 SOLUTION: The beverage industry knows 
            what works to recover containers because they invented the deposit 
            system for refillable glass bottles, and they operate the system in 
            the 10 U.S. states where they are required to do it. Those 10 states 
            with deposits recycle more bottles and cans than all the other 40 
            states together. When corporations take responsibility for their products 
            and packaging at end of life, there is an incentive to make less wasteful, 
            less toxic, less over-packaged and more durable products. For beverage 
            containers, that means that container wasting will only decrease significantly 
            when brand owners (the place in the supply chain that has the most 
            control over packaging decisions) are made to take physical or financial 
            responsibility for getting their containers back.
 
 
 
              (See 
              the links in table above right for more. Click on the links in the 
              table below to navigate further down this page) 
                | CAMPAIGN 
                  UPDATE: As a result of consumer pressure, Coca-Cola is making 
                  progress towards their original goal of using 25% recycled plastic 
                  in bottles (they are close to 10% in North America). In February 
                  2002, Pepsi committed to using 10% recycled plastic by 2002. 
                  Coca-Cola participated in an objective, multi-stakeholder project 
                  to assess options to increase container recovery, but they abandoned 
                  the project after a report by the beverage industry's own consultants 
                  showed the effectiveness of deposits and ways of making them 
                  more cost effective. |  |  National 
        Beverage Producer Responsibility Act of 2003[top]
 BEAR 
        Report [top]GRRN 
        Statement (January 2002) [pdf] 
       About 
        the Report 
       Executive 
        Summary [pdf] 
       Full 
        Report (January 2002) [off-site]A new report on beverage 
        container recycling suggests that we can double recovery of beverage containers 
        - and save money at the same time. These are the unexpected findings of 
        a study carried out under the watchful eyes of both beverage industry 
        and environmental representatives, through Businesses and Environmentalists 
        Allied for Recycling (BEAR).
 Essential 
          Elements  [top]Based on the BEAR 
          report, a group of NGO and government participants developed a list 
          of essential elements of a deposit systems that maximize environmental 
          performance while giving industry flexibility to minimize costs. Below 
          are analyses of existing North American deposit systems that embody 
          different elements, a link to a website with descriptions of all North 
          American deposit systems, and a link to research on promoting beverage 
          container reuse.
 Trashed 
          Cans: The 
          Global Environmental Impacts of Aluminum Can Wasting in America, 
          July 2003, by Container Recycling Institute [off-site]
 Refillable 
          Beverage Containers Anti-Trust 
        Boondoggle[top] Here's a 
        breathtaking story -- how Coke and Pepsi got Congressional exemption from 
        anti-trust for their exclusive distributor franchises based on their testimony 
        to preserve the environmental benefits and economic necessities of small 
        businesses operating a system based on refillable bottles. Within months 
        of passage in 1980, however, Coke and Pepsi began dismantling the refillable 
        infrastructure and eliminating mom & pop bottlers. Coke and Pepsi 
        should be held responsible for providing increased environmental benefits 
        under the current system or Congress should remove the exclusive (and 
        very profitable) franchises enjoyed by the distributors. Hence the rationale 
        for an EPR-style bottle bill to level the playing field.  
        
         Beverage 
        Container Wasting 
        [top]
 Why all the fuss about beverage container wasting? For one thing, 114 
        billion soda and beer containers were wasted -- buried, burned or littered 
        -- in 1999, and the number is growing.
 Shareholder 
          Campaign [top]Socially responsible 
          investors are asking Pepsi and Coke to commit to achieving container 
          recovery levels for all containers currently attained in most deposit 
          states (80%), as well as to use 25% recycled plastic in plastic soda 
          bottles.
 
 
           
            | * 
              GrassRoots Recycling Network worked closely with Container Recycling 
              Institute on the Beverage Campaign. Some of the materials on this 
              site were developed with CRI. |  
 
 |